What Will The FAA Say About You?

If you hold a mechanic certificate or any other airman or medical certificate for that matter, the FAA has personal information about you. Depending upon how many certificates and ratings you hold, or if you have been involved in any type of incident, accident or enforcement proceeding, the FAA could have a significant amount of your personal information. The question many people ask is, “If asked, what will the FAA tell someone about me?” The answer to that question will depend upon who is asking the FAA for the information and how the FAA is being asked.

A request to the FAA for information regarding a mechanic or airman can generally be made under one of three statutes: (1) the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); (2) 5 U.S.C. § 552a, the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (Privacy Act); or, if you are mechanic who also happens to be a pilot for an air carrier, (3) the Pilot Records Improvement Act (PRIA). The type and quantity of information disclosed by the FAA will depend upon which of the above types of requests it receives and from whom it receives the request.

Freedom of Information Act

The FOIA was enacted in 1966 to establish a statutory right of access to federal agency records, and it requires federal agencies to disclose requested records unless they are specifically exempted from disclosure or specifically excluded in the FOIA. FAA Order 1270.1 details the FAA’s requirements and responsibilities for responding to FOIA requests. According to the Order, “it is the policy of the DOT to make information available to the public to the greatest extent possible in keeping with the spirit of the statute,” and FAA officers and employees are “directed to cooperate fully by making records available to the public in a timely manner and to the fullest extent consistent with this policy.” So, with this policy in mind, how is a FOIA request to the FAA handled?

Under the FOIA, the FAA will disclose information regarding accidents, incidents and enforcement actions. Any enforcement action will be disclosed, including cases that are still open, as well as those that are fully adjudicated and closed. However, “proposed” or “alleged” information contained in an open or pending case may be withheld until the case has been fully adjudicated and closed if the case is still in the investigatory stage. Such “proposed” or “alleged” information may include the proposed enforcement action(s) against the alleged violator, the sanction(s) being considered as a result of the alleged violation(s) and the regulation(s) that was/were violated.

If the person requesting the information follows the proper guidelines when making the request, and one of the nine FOIA exemptions for denial does not apply, the FAA will disclose the information requested. The FOIA request must be made in an acceptable and appropriate manner and must positively identify the person who is the subject of the request. A FOIA request should clearly identify that the request is being made under FOIA by including the words “Freedom of Information Act” in plain sight within the request, and it should also include specific details concerning the information being requested.

Interestingly, under FOIA the subject of the request does not have to give consent for the release of the information, nor does the FAA have to notify the subject of the request. Also, the FAA is not required to provide the subject with a copy of the information sent to the requestor, as is required with a PRIA request, nor is the FAA required to provide any accounting to a certificate holder who desires to know if another person has made a request concerning his or her records.

Privacy Act

FAA Order 1280.1 explains the procedures and duties for the FAA to follow in processing an information request under the Privacy Act. The FAA’s release of information under the Privacy Act will depend upon who is making the request.

Upon request by an “Individual,” the FAA will release information concerning accidents, incidents or FAA enforcement information involving the individual, verification of the individual’s medical certification information, and verification of the individual’s airman certification information. A “third party (company)” may request records including verification of the medical certificate, pilot or mechanic certificate, or any other authorized certificate held by a mechanic or airman, accident and incident information and FAA enforcement information.

The requester must provide identification proving that the requester is the person he or she says. Additionally, unlike the PRIA or FOIA, the Privacy Act provides the subject mechanic or airman with the right to request the identities of persons outside of U.S. Government agencies who have requested and received information pertaining to that individual.

Pilot Records Improvement Act

Although PRIA does not apply to mechanics, some mechanics also hold airman certificates and fly for an air carrier. If one of those mechanics/pilots is applying for a pilot position with an air carrier, that air carrier is required, among other things, to make a PRIA request to the FAA. Advisory Circular (AC) 120-68F sets forth not only guidance to air carriers for compliance with the PRIA, but it also identifies the information that the FAA will disclose in response to a PRIA request.

The FAA will disclose (1) current airman certificates with associated type ratings and limitations; (2) current airman medical certificate including any limitations; and (3) summaries of FAA legal enforcement actions resulting in a finding by the Administrator of a violation that was not subsequently overturned. That means the FAA is only required to disclose fully adjudicated (e.g., the case has been resolved by decision or settlement) and closed enforcement cases in response to a PRIA request.

The FAA will not provide information concerning accidents or incidents in which the pilot may have been involved, nor will it release information regarding open, pending, cases under appeal or reopened enforcement cases. According to the FAA’s Office of Chief Council, release of this information would be unfair to the pilot because: (1) the reports may or may not involve pilot error; (2) pilots identified in accident and incident reports do not receive the same due process protections as they receive in a legal enforcement action; and (3) the outcome of open cases that have not been fully reviewed by FAA, NTSB, or possibly by a U.S. Court of Appeals, is uncertain because such cases could eventually be dropped or dismissed by the court.

Conclusion

With the privilege of a mechanic’s or other airman’s certificate comes concern regarding the FAA’s maintenance and retention of your personal information. Unfortunately, the FAA is required to disclose some, if not all, of that personal information, depending upon the type of request it receives. The FAA will disclose a great deal more information in response to a FOIA or Privacy Act request than it will to a PRIA request. As a result, employers requesting information as required by the PRIA are often also making a concurrent FOIA or Privacy Act request in order to obtain more information about their applicants or employees.

If you are concerned with who may have requested information about you from the FAA, you can make a request under the Privacy Act to find out whether anyone has made a Privacy Act request about you. Or, if you believe that too much or the wrong information was disclosed, consult with the applicable FAA orders or a knowledgeable aviation attorney to determine whether the FAA followed proper procedures.

At the end of the day, a mechanic’s or airman’s personal information is available to the inquiring public. People can find out about you and you can find out about other mechanics and airmen. Just ask the FAA.

 

Greg Reigel is an aviation attorney, author and pilot. He holds a commercial pilot certificate (single-engine land and sea and multi-engine land) with instrument rating. His practice concentrates on aviation litigation, including aviation insurance matters and FAA certificate actions, and also aviation transactional matters. He is admitted to practice law in Minnesota and Wisconsin and advises clients throughout the country on aviation law matters. A cum laude graduate of William Mitchell College of Law, Reigel is the founder and president of the law firm Reigel & Associates Ltd./Aero Legal Services based in Hopkins, MN. He frequently speaks to groups on aviation and business law issues. Reigel is a member of the AOPA Legal Services Panel, secretary of the Minnesota Aviation Trade Association, and a member of the NTSB Bar Association, National Business Aviation Association, Minnesota Business Aviation Association, ABA-Forum on Air & Space Law, Lawyer-Pilot Bar Association and Experimental Aircraft Association.

© January, 2013 All rights reserved.

About D.O.M. Magazine

D.O.M. magazine is the premier magazine for aviation maintenance management professionals. Its management-focused editorial provides information maintenance managers need and want including business best practices, professional development, regulatory, quality management, legal issues and more. The digital version of D.O.M. magazine is available for free on all devices (iOS, Android, and Amazon Kindle).

Privacy Policy  |  Cookie Policy  |  GDPR Policy

More Info

Joe Escobar (jescobar@dommagazine.com)
Editorial Director
920-747-0195

Greg Napert (gnapert@dommagazine.com)
Publisher, Sales & Marketing
608-436-3376

Bob Graf (bgraf@dommagazine.com)
Director of Business, Sales & Marketing
608-774-4901